In The Shadow of Yesterday

Stories of people, places, and the echoes they leave behind……

Three Graves, No Birthplace: The Forgotten Origins of Memorial Day

In May 1966, President Lyndon Johnson signed a proclamation declaring Waterloo, New York, the official birthplace of Memorial Day. Congress had already passed a concurrent resolution to the same effect. Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York had signed his own proclamation two months earlier. The whole affair was very official.

Waterloo is a village of about 5,000 people in the Finger Lakes region. Its claim traces to 1865, when a local druggist named Henry Welles mentioned at a social gathering that it might be fitting to place flowers on soldiers’ graves. The community did so on May 5, 1866; their businesses closed, flags at half-staff, residents marched to the cemetery. Waterloo has been the official birthplace ever since.

Here is what the proclamation doesn’t mention.

In Winchester, Virginia, Southern women were already pulling Confederate soldiers out of farm fields before the war was even over; organizing, reburying, and building the organization of an annual ritual a full year before Waterloo’s druggist had his idea.

In Charleston, South Carolina, freed black Americans had organized a ceremony on May 1, 1865, drawing ten thousand people.

In Illinois, a Union general was about to seize the whole tradition and turn it into a political weapon, and he said so openly.

Three genuine origins. None of them in upstate New York. None of them in the proclamation.

The holiday we now associate with long weekends and the start of summer was invented at least three times, by very different Americans, for very different reasons. What those reasons were is important. The story of what got erased, and when, and why, is a revealing part of the story. You won’t find it in Waterloo.

An image of the Stonewall Confederate Cemetery in Winchester, VA
The Stonewall Cemetery in Winchester. A U.S. National Cemetery was placed alongside it.

The Ladies Do the Work No One Else Will

Winchester, Virginia, May 1865. The ink on Lee’s surrender at Appomattox was barely dry.

Mary Dunbar Williams was visiting her sister-in-law, Eleanor Boyd, whose husband — an ardent Confederate minister — had come home from a Union prison and was dying. During the visit, Williams heard what was happening in the countryside.

Farmers were plowing their fields for spring planting. The plows were turning up bodies.

The Shenandoah Valley had seen some of the war’s heaviest fighting. Confederate soldiers were buried everywhere; in shallow roadside graves, at the edges of fields, behind farmhouses, in wooded areas. Nobody had organized a recovery effort, because nobody was going to.

Congress had authorized a national reburial program for Union dead. By 1870, it would relocate 300,000 Union soldiers into 73 national cemeteries. Confederate dead were explicitly excluded. The United States did not bury rebels.

Reports out of Petersburg described Union burial crews selling Confederate bones to be ground for fertilizer. Whether every account was accurate is beside the point. The dead were plainly not being cared for, and everyone knew it.

Williams and Boyd called a meeting. The women who showed up were mostly former hospital volunteers who had spent the war nursing Confederate wounded and knew what a body looked like.

They formed what would become the first Ladies’ Memorial Association in Virginia; possibly in the entire South. Their purpose? Find all Confederate dead within fifteen miles of Winchester and inter them in a single cemetery, then establish an annual tradition of placing flowers on the graves.

No men organized this. No veterans’ organization called the meeting. The women who had sewn battle flags and emptied bedpans were the ones who came.

Within a year, by historian Caroline Janney’s count, seventy organizations like Winchester’s had formed across the South. Virginia alone eventually had more than twenty-six.

The seven associations of Richmond, Lynchburg, Winchester, Petersburg, and Fredericksburg together reinterred more than 72,000 remains, nearly a quarter of the South’s total war dead.

Stonewall Cemetery in Winchester, named for the general who had defined the Valley campaign, opened in 1866. The LMAs were building, without any government mandate or funding, what amounted to a Confederate national cemetery system.

The politics were baked in from the start, whether or not the women chose to call them that.

Women were considered non-political by mid-19th-century convention, and ex-Confederate men recognized the LMAs’ value immediately: the ladies could memorialize the Confederate cause without it being construed as treason.

The organizations were, in Janney’s framing, “therapeutic and political” simultaneously; genuine grief, channeled into an explicitly ideological project. You can believe both were true at once.

There was no coordinated calendar. Each community chose its own date based on local loss. Fredericksburg and Lynchburg observed May 10, the anniversary of Stonewall Jackson’s death.

Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond chose May 31. Winchester chose June 6, the day General Turner Ashby was killed near Port Republic in 1862. The ritual was the same everywhere: women and children decorated graves while ministers read scripture and former officers spoke.

The associations gathered in the days before to make floral arrangements. On the day itself, hundreds, sometimes thousands, marched to the cemetery.

An image of a Confederate cemetery in Charleston, SC, from the early 20th century.
The graves on Confederate soldiers in Charleston, SC. Many southern cities have separate Confederate cemeteries thanks to the efforts of the Ladies Memorial Associations that took it upon themselves to bury the hundreds of thousands of war dead.

The one that mattered most for what came next happened in Georgia.

In January 1866, the Ladies Memorial Association of Columbus reorganized from its wartime aid society and gave the title of corresponding secretary to a woman named Mary Ann Williams.

Williams drafted a letter; not addressed to Columbus, addressed to the South. It ran in the local paper on March 11, 1866, and then in dozens of newspapers across the former Confederacy.

Williams called on Southern women to unite on a single date — April 26, the anniversary of General Johnston’s surrender in North Carolina — to decorate Confederate graves everywhere. She proposed the day “be handed down through time as a religious custom of the South to wreathe the graves of our martyred dead with flowers.”

The response was national. Communities across the South observed April 26. Then something happened in Columbus, Mississippi, the day before — April 25 — that the newspapers seized on.

Four women arrived at Friendship Cemetery to decorate Confederate graves. They did. Then they looked at the Union graves lying nearby, bare of flowers. They put flowers on those too.

The story spread. Francis Miles Finch turned it into a poem, “The Blue and the Gray,” that made him briefly famous. Here was the version of events people wanted: Southern women, moved by simple human sympathy, honoring the enemy dead. Noble. Healing. Apolitical.

It would not be the last time a more comfortable version of the story displaced the harder one.

An image of the Friendship Cemetery in Columbus, MS
The Friendship Cemetery is the site of 2000 Confederate graves…..as well as those of soldiers from every American war.

Martyrs of the Race Course

The Washington Race Course and Jockey Club sat on Charleston’s upper peninsula, a one-mile loop around what is now Hampton Park. For seventy years before the war, it was the center of Lowcountry planter society.

Thoroughbred races ran there every February. The Alstons, the Pinckneys, the Hamptons; the names on the ownership charter were the names of South Carolina power. The infield was where the horses ran.

In the last year of the war, it was where Union prisoners died.

The Confederacy converted the Race Course into a prison camp. Union officers were housed in the old clubhouse. Enlisted men were kept in the open-air infield, exposed to the elements and inadequate food.

At least 257 men died of disease and exposure. They were buried in a mass grave behind the grandstand. The place where planter wealth had gathered had become a hole in the ground full of Union dead.

Charleston fell to Union forces on February 18, 1865. Confederate troops evacuated. Most of the white population left. The people who stayed were the ones who had been enslaved there.

Over roughly ten days in late April 1865, approximately two dozen black men went to the Race Course. They exhumed the mass grave, body by body, and reburied the Union dead in orderly rows.

They landscaped the grounds. They built a ten-foot whitewashed fence around the new cemetery. Above the entrance, in black letters: Martyrs of the Race Course.

The place that had embodied planter wealth and leisure — where horses bred by enslaved men were ridden by enslaved jockeys for the entertainment of the Lowcountry elite — was being consecrated by the people who had been enslaved there, for the men who had died to end it.

The choice of location was not incidental. Nothing about this was incidental.

On May 1, 1865, ten thousand people gathered. Most were freed black Charlestonians. Three thousand black schoolchildren led the procession, arms full of roses, singing “John Brown’s Body.” Several hundred women followed with baskets of flowers and wreaths.

Then men marching in cadence. Then Union infantry, including the 54th Massachusetts, the regiment recruited from free black men across the North, whose assault on Fort Wagner had become a national symbol of black military service.

Black ministers read scripture and hymns were sung. Then the crowd dispersed into the infield; picnics and speeches, with the 54th and 34th U.S. Colored Troops performing double-time marches around the gravesite.

Correspondents from The New York Tribune and The Charleston Courier witnessed it and filed reports. One Tribune correspondent described “a procession of friends and mourners as South Carolina and the United States never saw before.”

What happened next was decades of silence.

The story faded from local memory. The fence came down. The graves were eventually moved to a national cemetery, entered without names, unknowns. When the United Daughters of the Confederacy inquired fifty years later whether the May 1 ceremony had occurred, the Ladies Memorial Association of Charleston sent a puzzled reply.

In 1996, historian David Blight was working through two boxes of unsorted Union veterans’ material at Harvard’s Houghton Library. A file was labeled “First Decoration Day.” Inside: a handwritten veteran’s narrative and a reference to a New York Tribune article.

Blight tracked down the account. He called the Avery Institute of Afro-American History and Culture at the College of Charleston, the institution specifically devoted to preserving this history. They told him: “This never happened.”

Eventually he reached a woman who had grown up in Charleston. Her grandfather had told her about a parade at the old race track. “We never knew whether to believe him or not,” she said. Blight’s 2001 book, Race and Reunion, restored the story to the record.

Whether the Charleston ceremony was the “first” Memorial Day is a legitimate debate. Most historians argue it was a cemetery dedication rather than a recurring annual observance; a consecration, not the founding of a tradition.

Blight himself has acknowledged he has no proof it directly influenced the 1868 federal proclamation. But Adam Domby of the College of Charleston makes the point that matters more: the freed people of Charleston weren’t performing a preliminary version of someone else’s holiday.

They were declaring, in the clearest terms available to them, what the war had meant. The triumph of their emancipation over a slaveholders’ republic; that’s what the march said. That’s what the fence said.

Union graves at the racetrack in Charleston, SC
Union graves, the “Martyrs of the Racetrack”.

Not Too Late to Follow Their Example

John A. Logan of Illinois was a Democrat from southern Illinois before he was a Republican hero, and the distance between those two positions tells you something about the man.

Before the war, he represented a district with open Confederate sympathies. He had supported the Fugitive Slave Act and opposed abolition. In 1858, he was as pro-Southern as a man could be while still holding a Northern congressional seat.

The war forced his hand. He left Congress mid-term and raised the 31st Illinois Infantry, fighting his way to major general. When James McPherson was killed during the Atlanta Campaign, Logan temporarily commanded the entire Army of the Tennessee.

By war’s end he was one of the most celebrated non-West Point generals in the Union Army.

He came home and switched parties — not just to Republican, but to the radical wing — and served as one of the seven House managers in Andrew Johnson’s 1868 impeachment, whose Reconstruction policies Logan considered far too lenient on the South. He was simultaneously commander-in-chief of the Grand Army of the Republic.

The GAR ran on muscle, not sentiment. At its peak in 1890, it had 400,000 members and five presidents among its alumni. No private organization in postwar America wielded more political influence.

It pushed hard for Union veterans’ pensions and the teaching of Unionist war history in public schools; a lobbying operation dressed as a fraternal brotherhood, and a very effective one.

Logan already knew about Confederate Decoration Days. He’d been watching them for two years. In a July 4, 1866 speech in Salem, Illinois, he said it plainly:

“Traitors in the South have their gatherings day after day to strew garlands of flowers upon the graves of Rebel soldiers, that they may live in their memory as long as life shall last.”

He wasn’t celebrating this. He was calling it out, and framing it against the right of freed black men to honor the graves of Union soldiers. Logan knew exactly what the Confederate women were building.

Then his wife went to Virginia.

An image of General John Logan and his family
General John Logan and family. His wife, Mary, was the inspiration for Logan to get behind a Decoration Day effort, as the south had been doing.

In March 1868, Mary Logan visited Blandford Church Cemetery in Petersburg, a Confederate burial ground where women regularly decorated graves with flowers and small flags. She came home and told her husband what she had seen.

In her autobiography, she quoted herself telling him she had “never been so touched” as by the sight of those graves. Logan replied that it was “a beautiful revival of the custom of the ancients” and that “it was not too late for the Union men of the nation to follow the example of the people of the South.”

On May 5, 1868, Logan issued General Order No. 11 as GAR commander-in-chief. The language was deliberate. May 30 was designated “for the purpose of strewing with flowers or otherwise decorating the graves of comrades who died in defense of their country during the late rebellion.”

Defense of their country. The late rebellion. A Unionist counter-proclamation — the same ritual, reversed. The VA’s own institutional history of the holiday notes that Logan’s adoption of the Southern custom “was transparent to nearly everyone living in America in 1868.”

Southerners confirmed this within the year, when communities across the former Confederacy began marking their spring observances as “Confederate Memorial Day”, explicitly distinguishing their version from what the North had just claimed.

May 30 was chosen deliberately: it fell on no battle anniversary, leaving the date unencumbered and reserved entirely for the dead. Five thousand people gathered at Arlington National Cemetery for the first national Decoration Day ceremony.

James Garfield — Ohio congressman, former general, future president — spoke. The grounds of Robert E. Lee’s former home, seized during the war and made a national cemetery in part to ensure Lee could never return, were now the site of the country’s national day of military remembrance.

Nobody pretended the symbolism was accidental.

The GAR went to work. Northern states adopted Decoration Day in rapid succession. New York was first, in 1873, and the rest of the former Union states followed by 1890. The organization published handbooks specifying procedures and scripture for local post commanders.

It was a coordinated national ceremony administered by the country’s most powerful veterans’ lobby.

The official history credited Logan. It still does.

The irony needs no embellishment: the holiday officially attributed to him was invented by Confederate widows and shaped by freed black Americans, then nationalized by a former pro-slavery Democrat who got the idea from his wife, who got it from watching Confederate women in a Petersburg cemetery.

None of that appears in the official story.

An image of a stereograph showing Ulysses Grant and John Logan at a Decoration Day ceremony in Arlington, VA in 1873
This image shows then-President Ulysses Grant and John Logan seated at the Arlington amphitheater in 1873.

The Long Flattening

For the first decade or so after 1868, two versions of the holiday existed side by side. The GAR’s Decoration Day on May 30, explicitly Unionist in meaning and administration. Confederate Memorial Days in the spring, still on their various local dates, still run by the LMAs, insisting on a different account of what the war had cost and why.

The entire point was that they weren’t the same holiday.

Then the meanings started to blur.

Reconstruction ended in 1877 with the withdrawal of federal troops from the South. The shift in the Decoration Day speeches was almost immediate.

That same year, the Brooklyn Academy of Music gave its Decoration Day address to a former Confederate general, Roger Pryor, who had relocated to New York and become a Democratic politician.

Pryor called Reconstruction “a dismal period devised to balk the ambition of the white race.” He also reframed the cause of secession away from slavery. This happened at a Union Decoration Day ceremony. In Brooklyn. The year Reconstruction ended.

The formula that emerged, brave men on both sides, shared sacrifice, did something more complicated than simple flattery. Southern soldiers had fought for things they genuinely believed in: loyalty to their states, constitutional arguments that serious men had made for decades, communities and families they were defending. That was real.

The reconciliation narrative seized on that reality and used it to avoid a harder question: what, ultimately, those convictions had been deployed to protect.

At the same time, it drained the Union cause of the specific political content the GAR had spent a decade insisting upon. A holiday built to say these men died to defeat a rebellion rooted in the defense of slavery became a holiday that said these men died bravely, as did the others, and here are some flowers.

The Charleston origin had never been officially acknowledged in any version, and it was already gone from common memory.

The GAR aged out. Membership peaked in 1890 and declined steadily as the Civil War generation died. The last national encampment was held in 1949; the last surviving member died in 1956.

As the organization lost its grip on the ceremonies, the ceremonies lost their Civil War-specific meaning.

After World War I — with more than 116,000 American dead to honor and no sufficient number of Civil War veterans left to run the observances — Decoration Day expanded to include the dead of all American wars. It was a reasonable evolution.

The men who died in France deserved to be remembered, and a holiday exclusively tied to one war was becoming an artifact of a fading generation. But the expansion inevitably changed the character of the observance.

A ceremony built around the specific, unresolved arguments of the Civil War became a general tribute to military sacrifice. It was broader and easier to hold without reopening anything. Whether that’s loss or progress depends on what you thought the holiday was for in the first place.

The name shift followed the meaning shift. “Memorial Day” had been in informal use alongside “Decoration Day” for decades. Federal law made it official in 1967. The old name, with its gesture toward the specific act of decorating graves, was quietly retired.

Then the centennial of the first organized observances prompted a Finger Lakes village to campaign for recognition. The Waterloo Memorial Day Centennial Committee compiled its research and lobbied Albany and Washington. Congress and the president obliged.

Presidential Proclamation 3727, signed May 26, 1966: Waterloo, New York is the official birthplace. Richard Gardiner, a professor at Columbus State University and co-author of the most thorough scholarly account of the holiday’s origins, later called Waterloo’s claim “absolutely myth.” The plaque was already up.

Two years later, the Uniform Monday Holiday Act moved Memorial Day from May 30 to the last Monday in May, effective January 1, 1971.

The driving rationale was commercial; the travel and retail industries had been lobbying for three-day weekends since the 1950s, and they finally got the federal employee unions on board.

To his credit, Logan had chosen May 30 in 1868 specifically because it had no other associations, reserving the date for the dead. The Monday Act removed even that. The date now drifts around the calendar, landing wherever it lands, meaning nothing beyond the long weekend it creates.

The holiday that began as a fight over whose dead mattered is now, in practice, the start of summer. Ceremonies happen at Arlington and national cemeteries across the country, attended by the people who have reasons to attend them.

Congress established a national moment of silence in 2000, 3 p.m. local time, observed by a small fraction of the country. Flags fly at half-staff until noon, then full-staff.

In Winchester and Columbus and countless other places, women had pulled Confederate soldiers from farm fields nobody else would touch and built cemeteries where none had existed; doing the work of the holiday by hand, before anyone had named it.

In Charleston, ten thousand freed men, women, and children had marched around a racetrack cemetery to say what they believed the war had meant. By 1966, neither story had made it into the proclamation. Waterloo got the plaque.

David Blight found the file in 1996. The woman from Charleston heard it from her grandfather. He had been there, or known someone who had, and he passed the story down the only way it survived: in the family, with no certainty it would be believed.

That’s what this holiday is actually built on. Not a druggist’s idea at a party. Not a general’s order. Three separate acts of grief and political will, performed by people with very different stakes in what the war had meant, in the ruins of a country that had just torn itself apart. The question of what the dead deserved, and who got to say, was never really settled.

We just stopped arguing about it long enough to call it a long weekend.

8 responses to “Three Graves, No Birthplace: The Forgotten Origins of Memorial Day”

  1. Cindy Dawson Avatar

    Very interesting! Blessings, Scott!

    1. Scott Avatar

      Thank you, Cindy. Have a blessed weekend!

  2. Commonplace Fun Facts Avatar

    This is really good, and, of course, very timely.

    There is a strange appropriateness in the fact that Memorial Day grew out of the Civil War. The war divided the country so thoroughly that even the map looked like it needed counseling, yet the work of honoring the dead became one of the few places where North and South could find common ground. They could disagree about causes, politics, memory, and nearly everything else humans can disagree about while waving flags, but both sides knew what it meant to bury their dead and remember them.

    We need some unity today. It would be nice if we could return to some of that originalism, instead of being primarily focused on BBQ and the start of summer.

    1. Scott Avatar

      Thanks. Thank goodness for the calendar reminding me of stories. I’ve always found it to be a depressing story. It seems that the average person knew what it meant, but that organized “people” were quick to use it as ammunition and leverage.

  3. Anna Waldherr Avatar

    Thank you for sharing this truth. It is enlightening to learn that women played such a large role. Memorial Day (now characterized by barbecues and sales) is a solemn tribute to those who — each in his own way — gave their lives for freedom.

    1. Scott Avatar

      It was thanks to the ladies, for sure. Thank you for the time, Anna!

  4. Mustang Avatar

    I have little interest in general officers (or Admirals), then or now, because, with but a few exceptions in the 19th century, they were more politician than military leader, more arrogant than humble, and more incompetent than razor-sharp field officers. Logan, like many others, was as corrupt as the day is long. Today, our flag officers are far too political, worse perhaps, than during the Civil War.

    Your post is very touching, Scott. I read another similar post earlier on the Irish Confederates blog. Burying war dead was not much of a tradition in the early days. It seems as though it was all up to the senior field commander or the victor to decide what, if anything, would be done for the dead. In most instances, they would decompose where they fell, which could not have been good for the health and safety of anyone living nearby.

    If the fallen were buried at all, it was a shallow grave easily defeated by rain erosion, wind, or scavenger animals. Of course, the dead felt nothing. I grieve for those poor boys who, while prisoners, suffered mightily from exposure. There was no sympathy for them, not by the North or the South. At a time when it was a usual course following a battle, the victors would walk through the battle area, putting anyone still alive out of their misery with a bayonet. The only word I can think of to describe this is “depraved.”

    A final comment. The northern commanders may have referred to Confederate war dead as traitors, thereby justifying their ineptitude, but there is also a convincing argument that Lincoln and his radical Republicans forever destroyed the American dream, as envisioned by the Founders. On that note alone, I have long believed that Lincoln was one of this country’s worst presidents, and if we are tossing around the word traitor, then it may apply to Mr. Lincoln as well. After his presidency, the United States was never the same again.

    Thank you for tolerating my verbosity.

    1. Scott Avatar

      Welcome back, Mustang.

      I have to say that this is a first for me. I’ve never encountered anyone else that held one of my more controversial opinions before, but here you are!

      First, I agree completely with your characterization of general and flag officers. I don’t know any of my generation of veterans that doesn’t feel the same way about anyone over O-6. You’d think that senior officers were being vetted for political science degrees, but I digress.

      As to my controversial opinion, I know it’s heresy to say in this country, but I agree with your position on Lincoln. I live right around the corner from his birthplace, and have spent a chunk of my life inundated with Lincoln lore, and I can’t get past the fact that, however one wants to term it, the “first American republic”, if you will, was ended by him. There are numerous other bad acts he’s culpable for, but for some reason the myth of St. Abe persists instead of a realistic, record-based assessment that he was a ruthless politician. Many of the ills we’ve suffered since can be traced back to him. I suspect I’m preaching to the choir, so I’ll stop.

      I appreciate you sharing your thoughts, and hope this finds you well, sir!

Leave a Reply

Welcome!

I’ve always been drawn to the past and the stories that live there. Here you’ll find my musings, sometimes about history, sometimes memory, sometimes both. I hope you’ll join me for stories of the people, places, and events that made us.

Discover more from In The Shadow of Yesterday

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading